FFS nothing strawman... I posted the quotes to show the stupid logic the hack has...
I know what you posted and your quote agreeing with Giger based on what? Nothing. Giger said absolutely zero on backing his opinion but because his blame game on it needs to be coaching falls in line.
It's not a sin... But just like that Giger gave an opinion he gave zero reason other than the coaching staff are not coaching or are stubborn.
So you agree the staff is getting it done. Maybe it's scheme, maybe Clifford is not seeing the entire field yet, maybe just maybe the other WR have not progressed as fast. like I said regardless of size it is quite possible that Hamler has mastered all of the intangibles to be the best option on the fade... I told you it's more than just being tall and running a route. Being a 5 star means nothing if you are not getting it in practice.
Seriously, you act like you're the only one who understands that a lot of different things go into something, and that it's complex.
Yeah, no duh. Pointing out one possible issue is not saying that's the only issue I think they have. Providing a criticism of something the coaches are doing, isn't blaming the entire problem on that one criticism.
Do you really need a disclaimer every time someone posts a damn criticism like *note: this is just one criticism of a complex problem and I understand that many things go into a player succeeding on the field and this is just one of them
Come on man, this just gets tired. Most everyone on this board understands that giving a criticism isn't blaming the entire problem on that one criticism.
You would think my first post would clarify that considering I said "It's not ALL on Shorter". That quote obviously implies that I think while some blame rests on Shorter shoulders, I believe some rests on the coach's shoulders as well. However, that certainly didn't stop you from telling me that I was really saying the coaches were the only ones at fault.
FFS I wish one time you would back your opinion with something and not some hacks article.
FFS I wish one time you would back your opinion with something and not some hacks article.
I wish one time you you wouldn't take a quote where I say something like "It's not all on Shorter" and act like that implies I was saying coaching is only to blame.
As for backing stuff up, yeah pretty much every poster here can attest that I actually post a lot of facts and statistics. But sure, continue with your BS argument that all I ever use are "hack articles"
Yo do a lot of clarifying...
One breath it's not the coaching and then the next you are agreeing it's the coaching.
I'm sure you will say strawman then say I have a comprehension problem then clarify what you were saying.
My favorite time was when I disagreed with one play call in a game, and you tried to tell me that I hated Rahne and wanted him fired. That I was saying fire everyone because I dared to disagree with one play call. Good times...
To me, that's you in a nutshell. Take any statement you don't agree with and stretch it out to the 9th degree. Strawman plain and simple.
Yo do a lot of clarifying...
One breath it's not the coaching and then the next you are agreeing it's the coaching.
I'm sure you will say strawman then say I have a comprehension problem then clarify what you were saying.
Actually, show me one sentence where I specifically said the coaches weren't trying or didn't care to get better. You can't
The only thing I clarified is who I was saying it to, which was Southern. I was actually amazed it needed clarification at all SINCE IT WAS A DIRECT REPLY TO SOUTHERN'S QUOTED POST.
And since I don't seem to have to clarify what I say to anyone else on the board, maybe ask yourself why that is... because in the live chat I saw a lot of people trying to tell you they weren't saying the coaches should be fired, but you didn't seem to care and kept saying everyone was saying they should be fired
