So what, you're on record stating the Pac 12 sucked and the ACC is much better. You have stated that multiple times.SMU wasn’t ACC champs when we beat ‘em and Utah was the PAC champs when we beat ‘em so there is a difference.
Now all of a sudden beating the Pac 12 champs is a major feat while beating SMU (who lost on a last second FG) isn't good.
So in summary... you would have us believe beating a team who won a crappy conference, and who had half their starters opt-opt is better than beating a higher ranked team from what you have called a better conference in a meaningful game where both teams were at full strength.
Yeah that's just plain stupid. Sorry. And let me guess... Boise State won their conference but they don't count either.
You've also stated in the past that Clifford was able to get big wins because he won the Cotton Bowl ......... against Memphis. Again, it's complete bias BS and you just don't want to give Allar any credit. Explain that... why did you call Memphis a big win when Clifford did it, but neither SMU nor Boise are big wins?
