@roaminglion We all know the heavyweights of the SEC and Big 10 always faced each other in bowl games the PAC besides the Rose Bowl got garbage bowls. The PAC was the first conference to fold that was power 5.
@roaminglion We all know the heavyweights of the SEC and Big 10 always faced each other in bowl games the PAC besides the Rose Bowl got garbage bowls. The PAC was the first conference to fold that was power 5.
Seriously, how do you come up with this shet?
Is that why so many teams want out of the ACC? Because the conference sucks and they know it?
@psujoe just looking at who wins all the NC’s and who plays in the bowl games. When is the last time a PAC team won a NC? Look at the bowl money and which bowls pay the most that’s where they want the best teams. The PAC bowl games were all garbage unless one of their teams made it to the rose bowl. PAC teams just don’t win many big bowl games.
Homer, you and roam better stay out of Georgia and Alabama you’ll get laughed at talking that shit PAC football being a tough conference 😂
@southern-psu-fan speaking of garbage bowls look at where your favorite team from GA has been for the last quarter century. I guess it’s true what you say about Bowls not wanting shit teams from shit conferences.
- 2000 Peach Bowl
- 2001 Seattle Bowl
- 2002 Silicon Valley Football Classic
- 2004 Champs Sports Bowl
- 2004 Humanitarian Bowl
- 2005 Emerald Bowl
- 2007 Gator Bowl
- 2007 Humanitarian Bowl
- 2008 Chick-fil-A Bowl
- 2010 Independence Bowl
- 2010 Orange Bowl
- 2011 Sun Bowl
- 2012 Sun Bowl
- 2013 Music City Bowl
- 2014 Orange Bowl (December)
- 2016 TaxSlayer Bowl (December)
- 2018 Quick Lane Bowl
- 2023 Gasparilla Bowl
When was the last time anyone not named Ohio State or Michigan has been in a NC game from the Big Ten?@psujoe just looking at who wins all the NC’s and who plays in the bowl games. When is the last time a PAC team won a NC? Look at the bowl money and which bowls pay the most that’s where they want the best teams. The PAC bowl games were all garbage unless one of their teams made it to the rose bowl. PAC teams just don’t win many big bowl games.
Oregon has. Washington has. USC has.
...but I guess Oregon and Wasington "got lucky" in those semifinal playoff games.
Homer, you and roam better stay out of Georgia and Alabama you’ll get laughed at talking that shit PAC football being a tough conference 😂
You really don’t want to know what people from the north think of southerners and their knowledge of anything.
I love how arguing that the PAC doesn't suck has now become we're saying it's as tough as the SEC.Homer, you and roam better stay out of Georgia and Alabama you’ll get laughed at talking that shit PAC football being a tough conference 😂
@roaminglion we won the Ohio State battle….we won the Wisconsin battle…we won the big 10 battle but lost the Jim Delany battle so you’ll have to ask old Jim why he told the scam committee to take Ohio St..results Clemson 31 Ohio St 0. That’s what happens when you send the second best team to the playoffs!
@southern-psu-fan Fun fact, since James Franklin took over as PSU head coach the Pac 12 and Big Ten have played 33 regular season games against each other.
The Pac 12 won 20 of those games, none of those wins were by USC. The Big Ten won 13.
If their conference sucked, what does that say about the Big Ten?
Lmao @ Southern deflecting to something else every time he’s proven wrong. Even niccy would have given up by now but Southern just keeps going and going.
We play USC, UCLA and Washington we will see. No excuses the games will be played. We have a new OC and DC and a rebuilt defense and OL but I believe we still give these teams an ass kicking. After we kick these teams butt don’t run and hide on me. Lol
What kinda BS excuse is this?We play USC, UCLA and Washington we will see. No excuses the games will be played. We have a new OC and DC and a rebuilt defense and OL but I believe we still give these teams an ass kicking. After we kick these teams butt don’t run and hide on me. Lol
"Well sure the PAC conference showed over 8+ years that when they played the Big Ten, they won a lot of games......... but, but, but let's see what Penn State does againt them?
WTF does that have to do with conference strength over the past 8+ years?
Here we go again with that stupid if we beat them this year that means we would have beaten them last year theory. If that’s the way people in Georgia think you’re right I definitely don’t want to go thereWe play USC, UCLA and Washington we will see. No excuses the games will be played. We have a new OC and DC and a rebuilt defense and OL but I believe we still give these teams an ass kicking. After we kick these teams butt don’t run and hide on me. Lol
.
James Franklin sucks, we have a new OC and DC and rebuilding the defense, OL and WR’s and Penn St is the 3rd best team over the last 10 years playing the defending champions of the PAC and one of their traditional heavyweights and UCLA an ok team for the PAC and IMO we kick the shit out of ‘em. These teams will get a taste of big 10 football…that’s what I mean.
And Washington is really going to get an ass full of Big 10 football during the whiteout 😁🇺🇸🍺
@southern-psu-fan lol Washington is replacing 21 of 22 starters, 29 players on their 2 deep and an entire coaching staff so to say this year is in any way relevant to last year is well beyond ridiculous. They also lost 40 players in one month and have been in total rebuild.
We should beat them like a rug.
Not sure how the word rug got into my last post.
Was supposed to say beat them like a DRUM
@southern-psu-fan How about 4 and 4 and hand off to Barkley in backfield and tackled for a loss. How about Illinois at home losing that is way to many. Not to mention how many games up by 14+ in second half and the games were lost.
Oregon will get better since they can buy the best players and the teams in California will probably get better because there’s a chit pot full of rich people out there and money is no problem for them to buy all the good players around the country. College football is changing unless they put a salary cap on the teams. I don’t like the way it’s headed but it is what it is. I hope Penn State has deep pockets because they are going to need it even if the fans have to chip in. Money rules sports. Btw cohappy we would’ve run all over Oregon the last few years they couldn’t even win the PAC. Didn’t we beat the PAC champs in the Rose Bowl? Where was Oregon?
Yes, chest thump about beating Utah when they had a bunch of opt-outs and also lost their starting QB. Then turn around and tell us how we would have beat Ole Miss if we didn't have opt outs.Oregon will get better since they can buy the best players and the teams in California will probably get better because there’s a chit pot full of rich people out there and money is no problem for them to buy all the good players around the country. College football is changing unless they put a salary cap on the teams. I don’t like the way it’s headed but it is what it is. I hope Penn State has deep pockets because they are going to need it even if the fans have to chip in. Money rules sports. Btw cohappy we would’ve run all over Oregon the last few years they couldn’t even win the PAC. Didn’t we beat the PAC champs in the Rose Bowl? Where was Oregon?
Basically when we win it's because we are awesome, not because Utah was missing players. But when we lose, we're still awesome and we only lost because we were missing players.
Seems legit
@roaminglion We beat Utah regardless if the QB gets knocked out. We were the better team.
The only thing I complained about in the ole miss game was the money I spent to watch Chop and the rest of the starters and they didn’t play. I was dying to watch them play. IMO Awful QB play is why we lost the Ole Miss game.
The more I hear about Kotelnicki, the more optimistic I become. I'm cautious about Tom Allen, but playing defense gets easier when the offense puts a lot of points on the board. If Kotelnicki can't deliver, this will be an unhappy season. Penn State has a lot of talent, but the other teams do as well.
I love how you just casually ignore the part where Utah had a bunch of opt outs too, and only acknowledged the QB getting injured. But even then, sure...@roaminglion We beat Utah regardless if the QB gets knocked out. We were the better team.
The only thing I complained about in the ole miss game was the money I spent to watch Chop and the rest of the starters and they didn’t play. I was dying to watch them play. IMO Awful QB play is why we lost the Ole Miss game.
I am certain Iowa also tells themselves they would have still won the game a few years back even if Clifford didn't get injured.
BS - you didn't merely "complain" about the money you spent... You literally stated when talking about the Ole Miss game: "IMO we win the game if all our players play"@roaminglion We beat Utah regardless if the QB gets knocked out. We were the better team.
The only thing I complained about in the ole miss game was the money I spent to watch Chop and the rest of the starters and they didn’t play. I was dying to watch them play. IMO Awful QB play is why we lost the Ole Miss game.
So it's exactly what I said: When we win, it's "we would have won even if their starters played." When we lose it's "we would have won if our starters played"
Complete double standard
