they love Wisconsin and Auburn but have no respect for us. Just looking at how many spots both teams jumped. I thought the more games you lost the further down you go lol. I guess losing to Illinois and getting blown out by Ohio st doesn’t matter lol
they love Wisconsin and Auburn but have no respect for us. Just looking at how many spots both teams jumped. I thought the more games you lost the further down you go lol. I guess losing to Illinois and getting blown out by Ohio st doesn’t matter lol
Stay calm AP and Coaches Poll mean nothing...
Coaches Poll did move PSU up one and kept Auburn behind us.
CFP is what matters.
My take on CFP
1.OSU
2.LSU
3.Clemson
4.UGA
5.Utah
6.OU
7.Baylor
8.Wisconson
9.PSU
10.Florida
The true top 5
#1 LSU
#2 Clemson
#3 Ohio st
#4 Bullpups
#5 Oklahoma
I only rank the top 5 teams because this is where the big dawgs play!
I don’t think Utah can beat any team in the top 12. The PACis worse than the ACC and that bad. If any team from the PAC or ACC loses a game they ain’t gettin in the playoffs. I believe both conferences are complete garbage except Clemson. Clemson is good and they are stacked but man have they had a cupcake schedule or what?
Oklahoma is bad no defense... Utah would run over Oklahoma.
Utah is stacked with NFL players across their defense.
I don’t think Utah can beat any team in the top 12. The PACis worse than the ACC and that bad. If any team from the PAC or ACC loses a game they ain’t gettin in the playoffs. I believe both conferences are complete garbage except Clemson. Clemson is good and they are stacked but man have they had a cupcake schedule or what?
What are you basing that on? Alabama and Oregon both lost to Auburn by the same amount. Oregon was also missing their starting 4 WRs for the game.
Never get excited about rankings.
I think we both know losing to Auburn last game of the year at Auburn in a rivalry game is much different than the 1st game of the year on a neutral site especially when Auburn was starting a freshman QB.
I think we both know losing to Auburn last game of the year at Auburn in a rivalry game is much different than the 1st game of the year on a neutral site especially when Auburn was starting a freshman QB.
Works both ways... Oregon had 4-5 WRs missing for the game too. Can't say Auburn was much better at the end and not admit Oregon was a different team too.
I think it is complete BS to pick and choose what games you value more than others based on when they happened. Tough... if you really want on the field results to matter, stop trying to make excuses for why teams weren't as good early in the season.
Picking and choosing the Alabama and Auburn game lol. Gimme a break roam you know better.
I think BAMA rolls Auburn with Tua... How about this stat, in the two BAMA losses they scored 40+ points.... Crazy
4* and 5* players gettin killed on defense. What has happened to the Tides defense? I went to the Alabama/Auburn game in 1988 at legion field in Birmingham nitnation and to this day all the games and races I’ve been too ain’t nothing compares to the intensity of that game. I’ve never seen as much hate in sports in all my life. It was brutal between the 2 fan bases. My buddy was an Auburn fan and I went with him and man what a game it was. I’m sure it’s still the same way. When them 2 teams play you can honestly throw out the wins record Lol
I have been saying it all year, the DL is a few notches below what BAMA is used to... I'm telling you the big difference is the BIG DOGS in the trenches, the last few years their DL could take over a game alone. It's why BAMA has been on top for so long and why they will continue.
Picking and choosing the Alabama and Auburn game lol. Gimme a break roam you know better.
I find it interesting that you say all the time you want teams to "prove it on the field", yet I continually see you coming up with justifications why early games don't matter, or saying "this team got better", or someone was injured, etc. etc. etc.
If you want it to be about proving it on the field, you can't use nonsense like "rivalry game" to justify one team's loss being better than another. If you lose, you lose. If you win, you win.
Both teams lost I get that I’m just saying when Auburn plays Alabama, Alabama usually gets Auburn’s A game especially if the game is played in Auburn. Teams get up when they’re at home especially rivalry games. Did you not see where I said the winner of the PAC and big 12 conference should get in the playoffs over LSU if they lose to Georgia? The committee won’t do it but it’s not right if Utah and Oklahoma wins their conference with 1 loss LSU gets in if they lose to Georgia because LSU knows what’s on the line when they play Georgia. Winner of the LSU/Georgia game goes to the playoffs, the loser goes home....period
Both teams lost I get that I’m just saying when Auburn plays Alabama, Alabama usually gets Auburn’s A game especially if the game is played in Auburn. Teams get up when they’re at home especially rivalry games. Did you not see where I said the winner of the PAC and big 12 conference should get in the playoffs over LSU if they lose to Georgia? The committee won’t do it but it’s not right if Utah and Oklahoma wins their conference with 1 loss LSU gets in if they lose to Georgia because LSU knows what’s on the line when they play Georgia. Winner of the LSU/Georgia game goes to the playoffs, the loser goes home....period
Are you saying that Auburn didn't give Oregon it's A game for the season opener? Hard to imagine Auburn didn't get up for a top 10 matchup.
It’s like the whiteout at penn st roam, our players are hyped for that game and sometimes crazy things happen when teams are fired up. The intensity of the game is bigger when the Alabama/Auburn games is played vs an Auburn/Oregon games, absolutely that’s what I’m saying. I never said Auburn didn’t want to win. Do you really believe penn st was fired up for the Rutgers game?
It’s like the whiteout at penn st roam, our players are hyped for that game and sometimes crazy things happen when teams are fired up. The intensity of the game is bigger when the Alabama/Auburn games is played vs an Auburn/Oregon games, absolutely that’s what I’m saying. I never said Auburn didn’t want to win. Do you really believe penn st was fired up for the Rutgers game?
We are 6-5 in all-stadium white out games. Hardly shows an advantage.
Not a bad record considering we play Michigan and Ohio State most of the whiteouts and 4 years we were under death penalty sanctions.
It’s like the whiteout at penn st roam, our players are hyped for that game and sometimes crazy things happen when teams are fired up. The intensity of the game is bigger when the Alabama/Auburn games is played vs an Auburn/Oregon games, absolutely that’s what I’m saying. I never said Auburn didn’t want to win. Do you really believe penn st was fired up for the Rutgers game?
Every game should be played like it is the whiteout game - we've been complaining about lackluster play most the season. A few quick scoring drives, then lots and lots of 3 and outs on offense. If you want to be a champion, you must bring that intensity every single snap.
Not a bad record considering we play Michigan and Ohio State most of the whiteouts and 4 years we were under death penalty sanctions.
My bad, we're actually 6-6 in all stadium white outs.
4-1 vs. Michigan
1-3 vs. OSU
1-0 vs. Illinois
0-1 vs. Iowa
0-1 vs. Alabama
So if it wasn't for the Wolverines, our white out record wouldn't look good at all. LMAO
It’s like the whiteout at penn st roam, our players are hyped for that game and sometimes crazy things happen when teams are fired up. The intensity of the game is bigger when the Alabama/Auburn games is played vs an Auburn/Oregon games, absolutely that’s what I’m saying. I never said Auburn didn’t want to win. Do you really believe penn st was fired up for the Rutgers game?
Every game should be played like it is the whiteout game - we've been complaining about lackluster play most the season. A few quick scoring drives, then lots and lots of 3 and outs on offense. If you want to be a champion, you must bring that intensity every single snap.
You're absolutely correct, BOB. I think it's on the coaches to make sure the kids are giving their best. Now that we have stocked up the roster (thanks to great recruiting!), if a starter isn't playing with intensity, pull him! JoePa didn't hesitate to bench starters and go with underclassmen when the effort wasn't there.
